BY: Winnie Monsod
AN ORGANIZATION I BELONG TO, THE Movement for Good Governance (MGG),
has, as one of its objectives, raising the level of discussion and
quality of information during the election campaign, so that the
information that voters obtain on candidates are not just those
provided by the candidates themselves (which are naturally going to be
self-serving) but have been subjected to scrutiny for either
feasibility (as in their platforms, which require the assessment of
experts) or authenticity (in regard to their claims, which require
investigation and drudgework). That way, the voter will be in a much
better position to choose their leaders for the next three or six years.
Manny Pangilinan's TV5 has picked up on MGG's work and will jointly
sponsor a five-part special series that will in effect showcase the
results of this scrutiny. And since Sen. Manny Villar's TV and radio
ads far outnumber the ads of his opponents, they provide much more
grist for an investigator/evaluator's mill.
Take the ad, for example, which roughly translated goes something
like this: "Have you experienced sleeping on a short bench in the
market? Or the death of a brother because you had no money
for medicine/proper health care, so you were helpless? Well, I, too,
have experienced all that. Which is why, when God blessed me with a
good life, it became my vow to help those who have nothing. If I really
wanted to get richer, I would just go back to being a businessman. If I
could get out of poverty, I can also do it for you. This is my vow: to
end poverty." The TV ads are highlighted by a 1962 picture of the young
Manny and his younger brother Danny-the year that Danny died-as well as
a Villar family picture.
The message being conveyed is simple and powerful: he was dirt poor,
but God got him out of poverty; and he has vowed to do the same for
others. And he is sincere: he is not running for president to make
money-because if he only wanted to get richer, all he needed to do was
go back to being a businessman. It is indeed a great ad. One viewer's
reaction was: Awesome.
Awesome, indeed. Because documents sent to me turn those assertions
on their head, so that the only thing accurate about the ad may be the
family pictures.
First there is the matter of the copy of a death certificate of
Daniel Bamba Villar indicated as issued by the NSO. According to that
document, Daniel Bamba Villar, son of Manuel Villar and Curita Bamba,
address xx (number illegible) Bernardo Street, North Balut, Navotas,
died at the Far Eastern University Hospital on Oct. 13, 1962, at the
age of three years and eight months, of cardio-respiratory failure due
to leukemia (there is something about red cells, but the writing again
is illegible), after a 13-day hospital stay. In the space for
informant, the signatory is Manuel Villar, father.
Now, that Daniel Villar was brought to a private hospital-FEUH had
the same reputation then as Makati Medical or Manila Doctors or St
Luke's would have now-rather than, say, a government hospital like the
Philippine General Hospital, or San Lazaro, does not necessarily
disprove the Villar ad contention that his family was poor. It is not
unusual for families, however poor, to do what is necessary in order to
secure the best care for their children, and damn the consequences.
That it was Funeraria Paz (one of the two top funeral parlors at that
time), as indicated on the same death certificate, that took care of
the funeral arrangements, again does not necessarily contradict the "I
was poor" contention, for the same reason.
But then, Villar does not just say in the ad that his family was
poor. He said his brother died because there was no money for medicine
or medical care. That appears to be clearly contradicted by the
certificate.
Moreover, there is the matter of the address provided by Villar
senior: apparently, from pictures and on-site investigation, Bernardo
Street in North Balut is part of San Rafael Village, a gated community,
equivalent at that time to FilAm Homes in Quezon City. A copy of the
Transfer Certificate of Title for the property-which is a
560-square-meter lot-has also been provided. Now anyone who can afford
to buy a 560-square-meter lot (the TCT shows that Villar senior
borrowed P16,000 from the GSIS for the release of the title-which at
current prices is roughly equivalent to P1.266 million) is not exactly
consistent with being dirt poor.
Finally, there is the matter of Senator Villar's assertion that if
he just wanted to get richer, all he needed to do was get back to being
a businessman. Again, the documentary evidence: his Statement of
Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) for 1992-the first year he
joined government as a congressman-showed that his net worth was P75
million. After nine years of being a congressman, and eight years of
being a senator, his most recent SALN (2008) shows a net worth of
P1.047 billion. Being in public office surely has paid off for him.
(from http://inquirer.net, monsod's column.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please drop me a line: