FATHER COMPLAINS ABOUT INVASION OF CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN AMERICAN AIRPORTS

An Open Letter to the Walt Disney Company

 by Arthur M.M. Krolman

Robert A. Iger
President & C.E.O.
Walt Disney Co.
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank, CA 91521

Dear Mr. Iger,

I am writing for your advice about how to best enjoy a great Walt Disney World experience with the new prohibitive TSA/commercial airlines "security" shenanigans. 

My wife and I have two children (one strapping 14 year old boy and our beautiful little girl, 12). They would just love to go to Disney World and we would love to take them – but now we don't know how to get there! 

Please allow me to graphically explain. On the way to Disney World at the airport, United States government agents now force children and their parents to make a difficult choice between:

1. a dose of ionizing radiation concentrated almost entirely on your skin to create a nude image on the government's computer screen. They call this Whole Body Imaging, or WBI. Please see attached sample image of a male subject, also here. Note that the detail of the image, even before zooming in, allows the viewer to see that the glans is uncircumcised.

2. a government agent using his gloved fingers to grope/frisk/probe the exterior of the child's entire clothed body (including inspection of private parts) in order to ascertain the same detail of information as the WBI would have done (see above). They call this Enhanced Pat-down.

3. police escort to interrogation by TSA security as to your reasons for refusing the above two choices...followed by confirmation that you did not verbally abuse any government agents...followed by being permitted to turn around and go home.

As you can imagine, none of these choices appeals to us. Other than a fleet of Disney private planes or opening scaled-down Disney World resorts all across the country, how do you recommend that paying customers get to your resorts if decent caring for their children now prohibits them from using commercial airlines? 

Now that you are aware that children must submit to nude photography or inspection of private parts in order to enjoy the Disney experience (and on the way home), your silence on this issue may be seen by many as passive agreement with this new pathway to your business, which I am sure is not the case.

Please confirm.

Regards,

Arthur M.M. Krolman
CFA Founder and President
Krolman Corporation
56 Roland St., Suite 201 Boston, MA 02129

SEE THE LETTER AT:  
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/krolman1.1.1.html

LET THE SUPREME COURT KNOW THAT YOU SUPPORT THE RESTORATION OF INTEGRITY IN THE PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT. SIGN THIS PETITION

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK  TO SIGN THE PETITION. THANK YOU.

RESTORING INTEGRITY: A STATEMENT BY THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES COLLEGE OF LAW ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF PLAGIARISM AND MISREPRESENTATION IN THE SUPREME COURT

THIS IS THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE UP LAW FACULTY REGARDING THE PLAGIARISM AND MISREPRESENTATION IN THE SUPREME COOURT WHICH THE LATTER DID NOT TAKE LIGHTLY AND RECENTLY ISSUED A SHOW CAUSE ORDER TO THE FACULTY WHY THEY SHOULD NOT BE HELD LIABLE OF THEIR STATEMENT. 

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------

RESTORING INTEGRITY:

A STATEMENT BY THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES COLLEGE OF LAW ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF PLAGIARISM AND MISREPRESENTATION IN THE SUPREME COURT

An extraordinary act of injustice has again been committed against the brave Filipinas who had suffered abuse during a time of war. After they courageously came out with their very personal stories of abuse and suffering as “comfort women”, waited for almost two decades for any meaningful relief from their own government as well as from the government of Japan, got their hopes up for a semblance of judicial recourse in the case of Vinuya v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 162230 (28 April 2010), they only had these hopes crushed by a singularly reprehensible act of dishonesty and misrepresentation by the Highest Court of the land.

It is within this frame that the Faculty of the University of the Philippines College of Law views the charge that an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court committed plagiarism and misrepresentation in Vinuya v. Executive Secretary. The plagiarism and misrepresentation are not only affronts to the individual scholars whose work have been appropriated without correct attribution, but also a serious threat to the integrity and credibility of the Philippine Judicial System.

In common parlance, ‘plagiarism’ is the appropriation and misrepresentation of another person’s work as one’s own. In the field of writing, it is cheating at best, and stealing at worst. It constitutes a taking of someone else’s ideas and expressions, including all the effort and creativity that went into committing such ideas and expressions into writing, and then making it appear that such ideas and expressions were originally created by the taker. It is dishonesty, pure and simple. A judicial system that allows plagiarism in any form is one that allows dishonesty. Since all judicial decisions form part of the law of the land, to allow plagiarism in the Supreme Court is to allow the production of laws by dishonest means. Evidently, this is a complete perversion and falsification of the ends of justice.

A comparison of the Vinuya decision and the original source material shows that the ponente merely copied select portions of other legal writers’ works and interspersed them into the decision as if they were his own, original work. Under the circumstances, however, because the Decision has been promulgated by the Court, the Decision now becomes the Court’s and no longer just the ponente’s. Thus the Court also bears the responsibility for the Decision. In the absence of any mention of the original writers’ names and the publications from which they came, the thing speaks for itself.

So far there have been unsatisfactory responses from the ponente of this case and the spokesman of the Court.

It is argued, for example, that the inclusion of the footnotes from the original articles is a reference to the ‘primary’ sources relied upon. This cursory explanation is not acceptable, because the original authors’ writings and the effort they put into finding and summarizing those primary sources are precisely the subject of plagiarism. The inclusion of the footnotes together with portions of their writings in fact aggravates, instead of mitigates, the plagiarism since it provides additional evidence of a deliberate intention to appropriate the original authors’ work of organizing and analyzing those primary sources.

It is also argued that the Members of the Court cannot be expected to be familiar with all legal and scholarly journals. This is also not acceptable, because personal unfamiliarity with sources all the more demands correct and careful attribution and citation of the material relied upon. It is a matter of diligence and competence expected of all Magistrates of the Highest Court of the Land.

But a far more serious matter is the objection of the original writers, Professors Evan Criddle and Evan Fox-Descent, that the High Court actually misrepresents the conclusions of their work entitled “A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens,” the main source of the plagiarized text. In this article they argue that the classification of the crimes of rape, torture, and sexual slavery as crimes against humanity have attained the status of jus cogens, making it obligatory upon the State to seek remedies on behalf of its aggrieved citizens. Yet, the Vinuya decision uses parts of the same article to arrive at the contrary conclusion. This exacerbates the intellectual dishonesty of copying works without attribution by transforming it into an act of intellectual fraud by copying works in order to mislead and deceive.

The case is a potential landmark decision in International Law, because it deals with State liability and responsibility for personal injury and damage suffered in a time of war, and the role of the injured parties’ home States in the pursuit of remedies against such injury or damage. National courts rarely have such opportunities to make an international impact. That the petitioners were Filipino “comfort women” who suffered from horrific abuse during the Second World War made it incumbent on the Court of last resort to afford them every solicitude. But instead of acting with urgency on this case, the Court delayed its resolution for almost seven years, oblivious to the deaths of many of the petitioners seeking justice from the Court. When it dismissed the Vinuya petition based on misrepresented and plagiarized materials, the Court decided this case based on polluted sources. By so doing, the Supreme Court added insult to injury by failing to actually exercise its “power to urge and exhort the Executive Department to take up the claims of the Vinuya petitioners. Its callous disposition, coupled with false sympathy and nonchalance, belies a more alarming lack of concern for even the most basic values of decency and respect. The reputation of the Philippine Supreme Court and the standing of the Philippine legal profession before other Judiciaries and legal systems are truly at stake.

The High Court cannot accommodate less than absolute honesty in its decisions and cannot accept excuses for failure to attain the highest standards of conduct imposed upon all members of the Bench and Bar because these undermine the very foundation of its authority and power in a democratic society. Given the Court’s recent history and the controversy that surrounded it, it cannot allow the charges of such clear and obvious plagiarism to pass without sanction as this would only further erode faith and confidence in the judicial system. And in light of the significance of this decision to the quest for justice not only of Filipino women, but of women elsewhere in the world who have suffered the horrors of sexual abuse and exploitation in times of war, the Court cannot coldly deny relief and justice to the petitioners on the basis of pilfered and misinterpreted texts.

The Court cannot regain its credibility and maintain its moral authority without ensuring that its own conduct, whether collectively or through its Members, is beyond reproach. This necessarily includes ensuring that not only the content, but also the processes of preparing and writing its own decisions, are credible and beyond question. The Vinuya Decision must be conscientiously reviewed and not casually cast aside, if not for the purpose of sanction, then at least for the purpose of reflection and guidance. It is an absolutely essential step toward the establishment of a higher standard of professional care and practical scholarship in the Bench and Bar, which are critical to improving the system of administration of justice in the Philippines. It is also a very crucial step in ensuring the position of the Supreme Court as the Final Arbiter of all controversies: a position that requires competence and integrity completely above any and all reproach, in accordance with the exacting demands of judicial and professional ethics.

With these considerations, and bearing in mind the solemn duties and trust reposed upon them as teachers in the profession of Law, it is the opinion of the Faculty of the University of the Philippines College of Law that:

(1) The plagiarism committed in the case of Vinuya v. Executive Secretary is unacceptable, unethical and in breach of the high standards of moral conduct and judicial and professional competence expected of the Supreme Court;

(2) Such a fundamental breach endangers the integrity and credibility of the entire Supreme Court and undermines the foundations of the Philippine judicial system by allowing implicitly the decision of cases and the establishment of legal precedents through dubious means;

(3) The same breach and consequent disposition of the Vinuya case does violence to the primordial function of the Supreme Court as the ultimate dispenser of justice to all those who have been left without legal or equitable recourse, such as the petitioners therein;

(4) In light of the extremely serious and far-reaching nature of the dishonesty and to save the honor and dignity of the Supreme Court as an institution, it is necessary for the ponente of Vinuya v. Executive Secretary to resign his position, without prejudice to any other sanctions that the Court may consider appropriate;

(5) The Supreme Court must take this opportunity to review the manner by which it conducts research, prepares drafts, reaches and finalizes decisions in order to prevent a recurrence of similar acts, and to provide clear and concise guidance to the Bench and Bar to ensure only the highest quality of legal research and writing in pleadings, practice, and adjudication.

Malcolm Hall, University of the Philippines College of Law, Quezon City, 27 July 2010.

(SGD) MARVIC M.V.F. LEONEN

Dean and Professor of Law

(SGD.) FROILAN M. BACUNGAN

Dean (1978-1983)

(SGD.) PACIFICO A. AGABIN

Dean (1989-1995)

(SGD.) MERLIN M. MAGALLONA

Dean (1995-1999)

(SGD.) SALVADOR T. CARLOTA

Dean (2005-2008)

and Professor of Law

REGULAR FACULTY

(SGD.) CARMELO V. SISON

Professor

(SGD.) PATRICIA R.P. SALVADOR DAWAY

Associate Dean and Associate Professor

(SGD.) DANTE B. GATMAYTAN

Associate Professor

(SGD.) THEODORE O. TE

Assistant Professor

(SGD.) FLORIN T. HILBAY

Assistant Professor

(SGD.) JAY L. BATONGBACAL

Assistant Professor

(SGD.) EVELYN (LEO) D. BATTAD

Assistant Professor

(SGD.) GWEN G. DE VERA

Assistant Professor

(SGD.) SOLOMON F. LUMBA

Assistant Professor

(SGD.) ROMMEL J. CASIS

Assistant Professor

LECTURERS

(SGD.) ARTHUR P. AUTEA

(SGD.) ROSA.MARIA.J..BAUTISTA

(SGD.) MARK R. BOCOBO

(SGD.) DAN P. CALICA

(SGD.) TRISTAN A. CATINDIG

(SGD.) SANDRA MARIE O. CORONEL

(SGD.) ROSARIO O. GALLO

(SGD.) CONCEPCION L. JARDELEZA

(SGD.) ANTONIO G.M. LA VIÑA

(SGD.) CARINA C. LAFORTEZA

(SGD.) JOSE C. LAURETA

(SGD.) DINA D. LUCINARIO

(SGD.) OWEN J. LYNCH

(SGD.) ANTONIO M. SANTOS

(SGD.) VICENTE V. MENDOZA

(SGD.) GMELEEN FAYE B. TOMBOC

(SGD.) NICHOLAS FELIX L. TY

(SGD.) EVALYN G. URSUA

(SGD.) RAUL T. VASQUEZ

(SGD.) SUSAN D. VILLANUEVA

(SGD.) GIGO ALAMPAY

(SGD.) RODOLFO QUIMBO

PRES OBAMA TALKS ABOUT BULLYING AND HATE AGAINST GAYS:" EVERYDAY, IT GETS BETTER ".

PNOY, PAANO NAMAN IKAW? MAGSALITA KA RIN KAYA?

Filipino group demands apology from racist radio host

By Bernadette Ellorin

Published Apr 8, 2010 10:26 PM 

April 3 — BAYAN USA joins the millions of Filipinos in the United States and around the world in taking collective offense to the tasteless remarks recently made by radio personality Adam Carolla regarding Manny Pacquiao, the Philippines and the Filipino people on his nationally syndicated show, “The Adam Carolla Podcast.” We also agree with the demand that Carolla issue an official apology for his insensitive and vulgar insinuations about [world boxing welterweight champion] Manny Pacquiao, Filipinos, and most especially Filipina women and children in the sex trade industry. 

It’s sad that in 2010 it must still be pointed out that the two unfortunate realities of the Filipino people that Carolla despicably chose to goad with ridicule — the Filipino people’s overwhelming pride in Manny Pacquiao’s success and the existence of the sex trade industry that consumes mainly young Filipina women and children — stem from the most unfortunate reality of all, widespread poverty and joblessness in the country.

Only in a very poor country such as the Philippines, where people are afforded very few economic opportunities to rise from impoverishment, can the sex trade or any black market industry proliferate into a cultural norm.

Carolla’s tirade against Manny Pacquiao being “illiterate” and “praying to chicken bones” is no different than mocking Filipinos for being poor. Carolla mocks further by stating that all that Filipinos have going for them is “Manny Pacquiao and sex tours.” Clearly, poverty and the choices it leads people to make in the so-called Third World are game material for comedy and cheap laughs from the likes of Adam Carolla.

Perhaps the even bigger offense beyond Carolla’s words that should not go unchecked is the mainstream corporate media’s tolerance and allowance of such derogatory and racist comments to even air. That a white radio personality such as Adam Carolla can boldly make those remarks against a racial minority with seemingly no air of reservation for the social ramifications ultimately reveals that corporate media here in the U.S. have barely progressed from the turn of the 20th century when, during the long-forgotten Philippine-American War, mainstream U.S. newspapers blatantly depicted caricatures of Filipinos as “n — — rs”, monkeys and dog-eating savages, all in the effort to justify what was to be the U.S.’s first colonial project abroad.

CBS Radio Inc., which broadcasts “The Adam Carolla Podcast,” is one of the largest owners and operators of radio stations in the U.S., with more than 140 radio stations across the country, reaching millions of listeners everyday. In 2007, CBS Radio fired radio host Don Imus for racial slurs made against African Americans on his now-cancelled show, “Imus in the Morning.” Incidentally, CBS Radio was also the former home of notorious radio personality Howard Stern, who in 1992 used his nationally syndicated radio show to issue a warning that the Philippines “is a country where fathers sell their own daughters for sex” and that he wouldn’t recommend anyone go to the Philippines “unless you want to get laid.”

Despite making contributions to the U.S. for more than 100 years, Filipinos — one of the largest Asian groups in the country, numbering at nearly 4 million — are still painfully absent from mainstream media. With the likes of Adam Carolla, Howard Stern, Alec Baldwin, David Letterman and even the writing team of ABC’s Desperate Housewives each taking very public jabs against Filipinos and Filipino culture, it is no wonder why Filipinos would welcome and rally in support when one of their own rises from underdog obscurity to become perhaps the most successful boxing champion in recent history and deservedly earning worldwide respect and admiration.

Corporate media outlets such as CBS Radio Inc., Clear Channel Communications, Citadel Broadcasting and the media oligarchs such as Viacom that own them, literally profit in the billions annually off one task — disseminating information to the public and shaping public opinion. When left in the hands and interests of multinational corporations, we see how racists such as Adam Carolla, Don Imus and Howard Stern are offered lucrative deals and the power of their own nationally syndicated shows. While it remains to be seen how CBS Radio Inc. will respond to Carolla’s remarks now that the Filipino community is rightfully taking issue with it, clearly the bigger fight remains in the struggle against systemic institutional racism and for responsible media messaging that entails inclusion and representation of all racial minorities that suffer from marginalization. 

The writer is the chairperson of BAYAN USA.  E-mail: chair@bayanusa.org

Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news DONATE

TOO MUCH SHIT FROM ADAM CAROLLA, A CRAZY INSENSITIVE MAN'S RANT AGAINST FILIPINOS

Adam Carolla, Comedian and radio personality who now hosts The Adam Carolla Podcast, on Manny Pacquiao's refusal to do a drug testing before the fight against Mayweather, said that Manny's refusal is a "cultural thing" because "he is from the Philippines and then said that Pacquiao's faith consisted of "praying to chicken bones".

Carolla said these and more when discussing the Philippines with a man on the phone live and said, "Here's how you know when your country doesn't have a lot going for it: When everything is about Manny Pacquiao." Noting that Pacquiao is the Philippines' biggest celebrity and may be popular enough to be elected president, Carolla advised the Philippines to "Get a fucking life as a country." He added that due to Manny's popularity he also added "You want some guy with brain damage running your country? Why don't you get your shit together?" referring to us, Filipinos to get our acts together.

Carolla also said the Philippines is known for "sex stores" and even asked people to do research about the stores.

Here's the bio of this nutcrack:

Adam was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to an Italian American father and a Hungarian American mother. During his morning show on August 1, 2006, Adam spoke of his Hungarian grandfather. He attended North Hollywood High School, where he was voted class clown and was the captain of his football team but never received good grades, graduating with a 1.75 grade point average (though due to an unreturned library book, he never actually received a diploma). Adam began living on his own at the age of 18 and briefly attended Los Angeles Valley College, a junior college, before dropping out to work in a series of jobs, including a carpet cleaner, carpenter, traffic school instructor and boxing instructor.

In his spare time Adam Carolla worked on his comedy skills, training with The Groundlings and attempting stand-up, but he didn't believe either of these were a good fit for him (though he did perform sketch comedy with ACME Comedy Theater for a few years). In his late twenties he heard an ad on the radio seeking a boxing instructor to train Jimmy Kimmel, who at the time was a radio personality on the KROQ morning show Kevin and Bean as Jimmy the Sports Guy. Adam met Kimmel at the radio station and the two became best friends. Carolla eventually joined the show's repertoire as Mr. Birchum, the Vietnam veteran shop teacher.

Here is the whole interview and bashing against not just Pacquiao but including the Filipino nation.




MY TAKE:

It really wouldn't have mattered to me should he bashed Pacquiao black and blue like a boxing match. He has his privilege as a commentator but commenting carelessly about a nation like ours is out of bounds. His rants about us being a nation and getting a life is uncalled for. While we may not be as rich and as sought after as the USA which he is at present, he does not have he right or an inch of it to advise us and talk ill about our culture, and what to do with our admiration for a boxer who has united the nation during his fights and has brought honor to the country.

I will not rant about America, I do not have the right unlike this unprofessional and insensitive ADAM CAROLLA who said that all we have in the country is Pacquiao and sex stores, think again. You have more sex stores there than the Philippines. We have more to brag not just Pacquiao. Ours is a country of faith and not praying on chicken bones unlike Carolla who sounds like an atheist and is definitely a son of the devil himself who pretends to be Carolla.

Write ups from America have said that Carolla was just taking a free ride from Pacman's stardom. and "kasikatan". His career as a comedian and actor is going nowhere and he has to do all of this just to get attention. I pity you, Mr. Carolla, you have to talk ill about us just to get noticed? Poor you.

Nevertheless, thank you Mr Carolla for showing that my nation is envied and talked about. Thank you for placing us on the map. What you did was not shattering the Filipinos but exposing your insecurity on how a great nation we are, and how we take pride in our brother's victory as a nation.

LASTLY MR CAROLLA, SANA MAMATAY KA NA SA INGGIT! 

Have you ever seen a monkey like this? Only in America! Mind you, he is a comedian and a commentator. If he is in Manila, I would put him in the zoo.

Have you seen the most desperate, the most hopeless and insensitive American who is the son of the devil himself? ADAM CAROLLA. I wouldn't even buy him in a sex shop, he is virus.

Open Letter to ALL Filipino LGBT Individuals, Organizations, and Allies Regarding LGBT Killings

Since the initiative of MCCQC, SGO-Phils, OUTPhils, GABAY, IFTAS and other concerned LGBT individuals and formations last September 2009 we only have accounted a few cases (past cases were researched from news archives): Documenting these cases would provide our legislators ammunition to pass the Anti-Discrimination Bill pending in congress as well as lobbying for an Anti-Hate Crime Bill.

We make this call again to everyone: If you have heard or known of a murder or homicide case or any incident of violence which the LGBT community is targeted please send us the following information at the MCCQC e-mail metropolitancommunitychurchqc@gmail.com or IFTAS mtlacsamana@gmail.com. If you are a member of any of the participating organizations mentioned in this letter, contact your community leaders:

1. Name of the Victim
2. Age of the Victim
3. Profession of the Victim
4. Date of Crime
5. Circumstances how they were killed and how they were found
6. Notes or other information on the police investigation. When available, kindly inform us too of contact persons whom we can keep in touch with so we can verify and probe deeper into the case at hand.

Confidentiality regarding information on the victims and the respondents will be ensured. We all need to act to end the killings.

The information received will be used for dialogues with the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and the Philippine National Police (PNP).

Thank you very much! Peace and safety be with us all.

MCC
metropolitancommunitychurchqc@gmail.com
Rev. Ceejay Agbayani

Or

IFTAS
mtlacsamana@gmail.com
Mr. Marlon Lacsamana

Posted below are some of the cases documented and gathered from newspaper-archives (all names here are from these archives and the others are coded unknown to keep confidentiality):

1998 QC – Larry Arciaga (Salon owner) – Unknown - unresolved
2004 QC – William Castro – (DZAM radio announcer) – Unknown - unresolved
2004 QC – Lorna Dating (Househelp) – Unknown - unresolved
2005 QC - Larry Estandarte (Researcher Rated K) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2005 QC - Father Robert Tanghal (Priest) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2005 QC - Joel Binsali (Beautician) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2005 QC - Carl Roman Santos (Advertising Consultant) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2005 QC - William Castro (Broadcaster) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2005 QC - Eli Pormaran (Entertainment Writer) – multiple stab wounds – resolved?
2006 QC - Melchor Vergel de Dios (Fashion Designer) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2006 QC - Joselito Siervo (EP Pinoy Dream Academy) – multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide - unresolved
2006 QC - Francisco Uy (Businessman) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) – unresolved
2008 QC – Romeo Lim (Salon owner) - Unknown - unresolved
2009 Iloilo - Epi Ramos (Doctor, HIV Advocate) – multiple stab wound – resolved?
2009 San Mateo, Rizal - VJ Rubio (Faculty - La Salle Antipolo, Writer) - strangulation (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2009 QC - Winton Ynion (Faculty – UE Recto, Palanca Awardee) - multiple stab wounds (robbery with homicide) – unresolved
2009 QC – Aries Alcantara (hairdresser) – Unknown – unresolved
2009 Dumaguete – Ambrosio Miguel Madamba (Doctor) – Multiple gun-shot wounds (murder) – unresolved
2010 Dumaguete – Jayfel Reyoso (2nd year Mass Communication Student, Siliman University) – strangled, tortured and slit at the neck (robbery with homicide) - unresolved
2010 Iloilo - Matilde Sinolan (unknown - lesbian) – Gunshot on the face – Killer (Leonides Honejar) at large
2010 QC - Enrique Esguerra (unknown) - stabbed with ice pick and a plastic bag over his head (robbery with homicide) – unresolved