New research has found for the first  time that certain types of water-based lubes to cause damage to the  outer layer of the rectal and cervical tissue, and may cause users to  be more vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.
New  research has found that some lubricants used in anal or vaginal sex can  cause damage to those tissues that can leave people more vulnerable to  sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.

A decade ago research presented  at the first microbicides conference showed that nonoxynol-9 (N-9), a  spermicide added to many lubricants to prevent contraception, was  extremely toxic to rectal tissue. Later studies demonstrated that it  increased the risk of becoming infected with HIV through vaginal sex.
The gay community learned to  avoid lubes containing N-9, and pressured manufacturers to remove it  from most products.
This long overdue study of the lubes  themselves put six of the most commonly used products to a series of  tests used to evaluate the toxicity of potential microbicides – products  that might protect against HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
An online survey by International Rectal  Microbicides Advocates identified the most popular lubes from among  more than 150 brands and variations on the market.
It turned out that the most important  factor is the osmolality, the amount of salts in the product.
Water-based lubes that were hyperosmolar  "were actually damaging the epithelium of the rectal and cervical  tissue," said Charlene Duzzetti, the University of Pittsburgh researcher  who led the study. "The one that was not hyperosmolar, that didn't have  any salts in it, and the silicon-based one, did not show any damage."
The top layer of cells that provides the  greatest barrier protection from disease was stripped away by the  lubes. The higher the osmolality of the lube, the greater the damage;  but the damage was not as severe as what had been seen in tests of  products using N-9.
Water-based lubes that scored  poorly were Astroglide, Elbow Grease, ID Glide, and KY Jelly. The only  water-based lube that scored well, with no harm to tissue, was PRe. The  condom-friendly silicon-based Wet Platinum scored equally well.
The openly gay founder of Wet Lubricants  said he was not surprised his product did well in the study.
"According to the study, ingredients in  some of the lubricants tested were found to be responsible for stripping  away cells on the rectal tissue, thus increasing the risk of  transmitting disease," Michael Trygstad, founder and CEO of Trigg  Laboratories, said in a statement. "The subject of the research study,  the Wet Platinum product we market, does not contain these dissolved  salts or sugars and was found by the study to have no toxicity."
A separate study, by UCLA researcher  Pamina M. Gorbach, analyzed a group of 229 men who had engaged in  receptive anal intercourse (RAI) within the last month, and 192 women  who had done so within the last year. It asked about sexual behavior and  tested them for chlamydia and gonorrhea.
It found that 76 percent used  water-based, 28 percent used silicon-based, and 17 percent used  oil-based [Crisco] lubricants, often in combination.
The men and women who used lube at the  last recorded RAI were about twice as likely to have chlamydia or  gonorrhea as those who did not use lube.
"This suggests that the use of some  rectal lubricant products may increase the risk of STIs," Gorbach said.
Unfortunately, the sample was not large  enough to see if there were any differences between the types of  products used.
IRMA's chairman, Chicago AIDS  Advocate Jim Pickett, said it's known that "dry" sex, with no lube,  often results in great physical damage to the rectum. It may be more  harmful than using even the most damaging lube. He called for more  research and urged the gay community to become wise consumers when it  comes to purchasing lube, just as they did in shunning products  containing N-9.
Duzzetti suggested looking for  lubes labeled isotonic or isosmolar, or silicon-based and condom  compatible.
The silver lining in this research is  that products behaved pretty much the same in both vaginal and rectal  tissue samples. It suggests that a product that is safe in the vagina  will be safe in the rectum. This may simplify the process of developing a  microbicide that protects against HIV infection.
Bob Roehr is a biomedical writer with a focus on HIV and  infectious disease. The article was first published in the Bay Area Reporter,  San Francisco's oldest and largest local LGBT newspaper; and is  republished with the author's permission.





















0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please drop me a line: